GamStop applies to participating UK-licensed casinos, while sites outside that framework may involve different protections, terms and risks.
What GamStop Covers—and What It Does Not
GamStop is a self-exclusion service for people who want to stop themselves gambling with UK-licensed online casinos. The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) requires the operators it licenses to participate. When you register with GamStop, the restriction applies to gambling with those participating operators.
That boundary matters. GamStop is not a general account setting that every gambling website can choose to adopt or ignore: for UKGC-licensed online casinos, participation is required. The service’s reach is tied to the operators covered by that licensing framework. It should not be confused with a promise that every gambling service a person might encounter is included.
A useful way to read the distinction is to separate the person’s registration from the operators covered by the service. Registering with GamStop records a self-exclusion that participating casinos must respect. The exclusion is not a ranking, endorsement or safety mark for other gambling sites. It describes a boundary around the operators that are required to take part.
What “covered” means
In practical terms, GamStop coverage concerns whether an online casino is within the UKGC system and therefore required to participate. If an operator holds a UKGC licence, GamStop participation is not an optional extra that the operator can leave out. The requirement applies across UKGC-licensed online casinos.
This makes the licence framework the relevant criterion when you are trying to understand what the exclusion covers. The name or appearance of a casino, the games it displays, or the wording used in an advert does not, by itself, tell you whether GamStop applies. The central question is whether the operator falls within the UKGC-licensed group.
For a registered user, the covered side of the boundary is clear: UKGC-licensed operators participating in GamStop must restrict that person from gambling with them. The service is intended to support self-exclusion, not to act as a general filter for every site or every form of gambling. Keep those functions distinct.
What the label does not tell you
You may see phrases such as “casinos not on GamStop” or “non-GamStop casinos” used to describe gambling sites outside the service’s participation. Those phrases identify a relationship to GamStop, not a standard of quality. They do not establish that a site is safe, suitable, or equivalent to a UKGC-licensed casino in the protections it provides.
Nor does the label explain why a particular operator is outside GamStop. That is a separate question from what GamStop itself covers.
This also means that “GamStop covers me” and “GamStop covers every place I could gamble” are not interchangeable statements. The first concerns the restriction at participating operators. The second assumes the service applies universally, which is not what its remit means. A self-exclusion service has a defined set of operators; the word “self-exclusion” does not erase that boundary.
A boundary, not a recommendation
If you are comparing descriptions of online casinos, treat GamStop status as one criterion only. It tells you whether the operator is within the service’s required participation framework; it does not, on its own, settle other questions about an operator. A search for casinos that bypass GamStop in 2026 may point you towards sites described as outside that framework, but the phrase should not be read as a recommendation to use them—particularly if you registered because you need gambling restrictions.
The distinction is simple, even if casino marketing tends to make it sound like a feature comparison. On one side are online casinos licensed by the UKGC, which are required to participate in GamStop. The service restricts registered users from gambling with those operators. The label “not on GamStop” describes a position beyond that participation boundary; it does not mean that GamStop has approved the site or that the site offers the same protections.
For a clear comparison, start with the criterion that determines coverage: UKGC licensing and the associated requirement to participate. Do not treat the presence or absence of the GamStop label as a verdict on the operator as a whole. Coverage is one defined thing. Nothing more.
GamStop Coverage
GamStop is a self-exclusion service that applies only to operators licensed by the UKGC, not to every gambling site available.
Top online casinos in the UK
- WinBeastBonus: €5000 + 500 FS + €650 Freebet · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- AmunbetBonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ZombillionBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- DieselwinBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- NightWinBonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- SlotoSportBonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
Why Some Online Casinos Sit Outside GamStop
The reason a casino may not apply a GamStop exclusion is usually structural, not a technical failure in the exclusion itself. GamStop operates within the UK Gambling Commission’s regulatory framework. A casino outside that framework does not have the same obligation to take part, and its account systems do not automatically receive GamStop registration data.
That distinction matters when you see a description such as “casino not on GamStop”. It tells you that the operator does not apply the scheme’s exclusion through its own service; it does not, by itself, explain why. The key question is whether the casino operates under the UKGC’s jurisdiction. Where it does not, GamStop has no regulatory route requiring the operator to check its exclusion records or act on them.
A separate regulatory boundary
GamStop is not a universal block that follows a person across every gambling website. Its reach depends on the operators that are required to participate. UKGC-licensed casinos must take part, so their systems can apply a registered exclusion. A casino outside the Commission’s regulatory reach is not bound by that same participation requirement.
This is why the phrase “casinos not on GamStop” covers a regulatory difference rather than a special category of account. There is no shared network automatically carrying a person’s exclusion status to every online casino worldwide. Instead, participation depends on the operator’s regulatory obligations.
Think of it as a boundary between two systems. On one side are operators required to connect their account processes to GamStop. On the other are operators beyond the UKGC’s reach, which do not have to use GamStop’s exclusion measures. The boundary is regulatory; it is not a setting that a player can change in a GamStop account.
Why an exclusion record does not travel
For an exclusion to be applied by a casino, the operator needs a process that recognises the relevant registration and prevents the person from gambling there. Participating operators are required to use GamStop as part of their obligations. A casino that is not required to participate does not automatically receive the same information or instructions.
USA casinos for UK players: licences and payouts
In practical terms, GamStop and a non-participating operator do not share the exclusion data needed to apply the block. That operator’s customer database and account controls sit outside the scheme’s operational arrangement. The absence of a match is therefore not evidence that an exclusion has ended or been removed; it reflects that the casino is not connected to the same exclusion process.
This also explains why simply having an online account somewhere does not mean GamStop has reviewed or restricted it. GamStop’s reach is tied to participating casinos, not to every account a person might create on the internet. A non-GamStop online casino can therefore have its own account procedures without applying a GamStop registration.
What the label does—and does not—tell you
The label can be useful as a basic description, but it is not a complete account of how a site operates. “Not on GamStop” tells you that the exclusion scheme is not being applied through that operator. It does not establish the operator’s regulatory status, the quality of its controls, or whether its own tools will meet your needs. Those are separate matters and should not be inferred from the label.
Nor does the phrase mean that the casino has found a flaw in GamStop. The mechanism is working within its intended scope: participating UKGC-regulated operators apply the exclusion; operators beyond that scope do not receive or act on the same registration data through GamStop. Different systems, different obligations.
If you are comparing an online casino not on GamStop UK with a participating UKGC casino, the first comparison should be the regulatory framework, not the design of the sign-up page or the wording of a promotion. A polished interface does not connect an operator to GamStop. Likewise, a casino’s statement that it has a self-exclusion feature of its own would not make it part of GamStop; the two are distinct processes.
For someone who has registered with GamStop, this distinction has a direct consequence: the exclusion is not a universal restriction across every gambling service. A site outside the UKGC framework does not have to apply it, and it does not share GamStop data as part of the scheme. That is the operational reason the restriction may not carry over—not a change to the person’s GamStop registration.
The important criterion is connection to the scheme through UKGC obligations. If an operator is outside that regulatory reach, do not assume GamStop will identify your registration there or prevent an account from being used. The absence of that connection is the point.
Ways Players Get Around an Exclusion—and Why Not to
When you have self-excluded, an urge to gamble can make a workaround seem like a small exception. It is not: each route can put distance between you and the barrier you chose, while leaving you without the protections you expected. The practical comparison is not between the “best” non-GamStop casino and a UK site. It is between keeping the exclusion intact and finding a way around it.
Registering somewhere that does not participate
A person may try to open an account with a gambling establishment that does not cooperate with GamStop. Because that establishment does not apply the exclusion recorded by GamStop, the restriction may not prevent registration there. This is the route most directly associated with searches for a casino not on GamStop in the UK.
That description is not a recommendation. A site’s failure to check a GamStop exclusion does not mean it is suitable for someone who chose to self-exclude. It means the safeguard you put in place may not operate there. Do not treat a site as the “best” option because it accepts a registration that participating operators would block. Acceptance is not evidence that the risk has changed.
If you are looking at non-GamStop casino sites because you want to gamble during an active exclusion, pause before entering personal or payment details. The restriction exists to create a barrier at a time when relying on willpower alone may be difficult. Finding another account can remove that barrier without addressing the reason you set it.
Risk of Bypassing
Finding ways to gamble during an active self-exclusion removes the protective barriers you set and does not address the reasons for the restriction.
Using another person’s details
A report published by neconnected.co.uk describes using another person’s personal details to register as a way someone might get around an exclusion. That is a reported route, not an endorsement or a sound alternative. Using someone else’s identity can expose both people to serious account and financial problems, and the other person may not understand what they are being asked to take on.
Do not borrow, copy or submit another person’s identity information to open a gambling account. Nor should you let someone use yours. Apart from the exclusion itself, identity checks and account records are tied to the person whose details are supplied. If a dispute arises, the account holder may be the person left to explain activity they did not carry out. A workaround can create a second problem.
Hiding or changing your online location
The same report discusses anonymising tools, including virtual private networks, anonymous proxies and the TOR browser, as possible ways to get around a restriction. Their mention here is descriptive, not a set of instructions. Using a tool to conceal your location or identity does not cancel an exclusion; it attempts to get past a control while the chosen restriction remains active.
There is no dependable protection in that approach. A site may still ask for identity or account checks, and an account created by concealing information may become difficult to use or resolve if questions arise. More importantly, using a tool to reach gambling while excluded turns a protective boundary into an obstacle to defeat. The distinction matters. A technical route is not permission, and it does not make the decision safer.
Waiting is not the same as bypassing
There is a legitimate difference between finding a way around an active exclusion and waiting until the selected period has run its course. GamStop does not allow you to bring that period to an early end: the restriction stays in place until the period you chose has finished. Once it has ended, you can follow the service’s process to unsubscribe. Until then, creating another route to gamble is a bypass, not a cancellation.
If you are counting down to the end of an exclusion, consider what you want the restriction to achieve before it expires. You do not have to treat its end as a signal to resume gambling. If you are struggling to stick with the decision, contact a gambling support service rather than trying to defeat the block. Waiting can be uncomfortable. Still the safer distinction.
Land-based gambling is a separate route
That is different from using another online account: a GamStop exclusion concerns participation through establishments covered by the service, while a physical venue is not an online registration workaround. But if you chose self-exclusion to stop gambling, changing venue does not address that aim. It may simply move the activity somewhere else.
The useful question is not whether a route exists, but whether taking it would undermine the boundary you set. Registering elsewhere, using another person’s details, disguising your location or switching to a physical venue can all keep gambling in reach during an exclusion. None changes the period you selected. If the urge is driving the search, step away from registration and payment screens and seek support instead.
Do
- Wait for the selected exclusion period to end
- Contact gambling support services if struggling
- Use a legitimate unsubscribe process after the term
Don’t
- Register with non-participating sites to bypass
- Use another person’s identity to open accounts
- Use VPNs or TOR to conceal your location
How to Read Bonus Terms Before You Opt In
A bonus headline tells you what is offered, not what you can keep. Before accepting one, compare the conditions that determine whether the promotion fits your play: the wagering requirement, which games count, any maximum bet while the bonus is active, the deadline and any cap on withdrawals from bonus winnings. A larger advertised bonus can be the weaker option if its conditions are harder to meet.
Start with the wagering requirement
Wagering requirements state how much qualifying play is needed before bonus-related funds or winnings can be withdrawn. Check what the multiplier applies to: the bonus alone, or the bonus plus your deposit. Those are different calculations, so do not compare two offers by the multiplier alone.
As a point of reference, a specialist casino-review source places wagering requirements around 30x to 40x and describes anything above 50x as generally predatory. Treat those figures as that source’s assessment, not a guarantee that a lower requirement is fair or achievable. The exact calculation, eligible games and other restrictions still matter.
If the terms are unclear about what must be wagered, or how the requirement is calculated, you cannot make a reliable comparison. Clarity is part of the offer.
Check game weighting before choosing how to play
The contribution rate tells you how much a game’s stakes count towards clearing the requirement. Slots may count differently from table games: table games can contribute less, or not count at all. That means a bonus that appears workable for one type of play may be much less useful for another.
Look for a game-weighting table or an explicit list of excluded games in the terms. Do not assume every game contributes equally. If the casino does not make the rules clear, the headline multiplier gives you an incomplete picture.
| Term | What to check |
|---|---|
| Wagering requirement | What the multiplier applies to and which play counts |
| Game weighting | Whether your preferred games contribute, and at what rate |
| Maximum bet | The permitted stake while wagering is active |
| Deadline | When the requirement must be completed |
| Withdrawal cap | Whether bonus winnings have a maximum payout |
Read the restrictions as a set
Bonus terms may set a maximum bet while wagering is in progress. A breach can affect eligibility for the promotion, so check the permitted stake before playing rather than relying on memory of the offer page. The relevant limit may apply only while the bonus is active, which makes it important to understand when that period begins and ends.
A deadline can also change the practical value of a promotion. Confirm when the time window starts and what happens if the requirement is unfinished when it expires. Do not assume that an incomplete balance will remain available.
Finally, look for a maximum withdrawal cap on bonus winnings. A cap can limit what you receive even after meeting the wagering requirement. Compare the cap alongside the multiplier: considering either term in isolation can make an offer look more generous than it is.
Compare by the terms that matter to you
If you are weighing up casinos not on GamStop, apply the same checklist to each promotion rather than ranking offers by headline size. One may have a lower wagering requirement but exclude the games you prefer; another may allow those games but impose a tighter deadline or a withdrawal cap. The better fit depends on which conditions you can accept—not on a label such as “best” or “top”.
Bonus Terms Check
- Identify the exact wagering multiplier
- Check if the multiplier applies to bonus or bonus + deposit
- Verify the contribution rate of preferred games
- Confirm the maximum bet allowed during wagering
- Note the deadline for completing the requirement
- Check for a maximum withdrawal cap on winnings
Read the full terms before opting in, and keep a copy of the conditions shown at the time. If a key rule is missing or ambiguous, treat that as a reason not to rely on the promotion. Fine print is still the offer.
Licences Outside the UKGC Framework
A licence from another jurisdiction tells you which authority claims oversight of an operator; it does not make that casino part of the UK system. Casinos with licences issued outside the UK are not required to connect to GamStop. That remains true whether a site describes itself as a Curacao-licensed casino not on GamStop or as a European operator.
Malta, Gibraltar and Curacao are among the jurisdictions where non-UK casinos may hold licences. The label alone is not enough to establish who licensed a particular site, whether the licence is current, or which company it covers. Treat the licence as a claim to check, not a protective badge.
Non-GamStop European Casinos: A UK Guide
Check the claim, not the branding
Start with the operator’s own terms and licensing page. Look for the legal company name, the licence reference and the regulator it names. Then compare those details with information published by that regulator. The name on the licence should match the company operating the casino; a logo or a line of text, on its own, proves little.
If the details cannot be matched, are incomplete, or appear to refer to a different company, you have not verified the licence. Do not fill the gap with assumptions. The operator’s site is making the claim; the relevant regulator is the place to check it.
This is also the useful distinction when comparing an international casino with another site: the jurisdiction and the verifiable licence matter more than broad phrases such as “licensed” or “regulated”. A Malta-based claim and a Curacao-based claim point to different regulators. Neither phrase, by itself, tells you what protections apply to a UK player.
Most importantly, a licence issued elsewhere is not equivalent to a UK Gambling Commission licence. It does not bring the operator into the UKGC framework or make GamStop integration a legal requirement. A site can therefore display a foreign licence while remaining outside that framework.
The comparison has two separate columns: licensing claim and UKGC status. Verify the first through the named authority; do not infer the second from it. A licence may be genuine and still offer no basis for treating the casino as UKGC-regulated. That distinction matters more than the site’s description of itself.
What UK Players Should Know About the Legal and Protection Gap
A casino licensed abroad and a casino authorised to serve customers in Great Britain are not the same thing. An overseas regulator may grant an operator permission to run a gambling business in its own jurisdiction. That licence does not replace the UK Gambling Commission’s permission to offer online gambling to people in Great Britain.
The distinction matters when you see a casino outside GamStop. A UK player’s use of such a site is not itself a criminal offence. But an operator that provides online gambling to UK residents without the required UKGC licence is acting unlawfully. So “the player is not committing a crime” should not be read as “the operator is authorised to serve the UK market”. Those are separate questions.
The protection gap is practical as well as legal. A non-GamStop site does not carry the consumer protections attached to a UKGC licence. If a disagreement arises, you cannot assume that the UK regulatory framework applies to the operator or that the same routes for resolving complaints are available. A licence issued abroad may regulate the business where it is based, but it does not make the site equivalent to a UKGC-licensed casino.
There is also a support gap. If you are using a casino outside GamStop UK, do not assume that UK-based gambling support services can intervene in a dispute with the operator or provide the same route back to the UK regulatory system. The site may have its own customer service, but that is not the same as independent UK oversight or locally available support.
A useful comparison is therefore not just “licensed” versus “unlicensed”. Check which regulator issued the licence, whether the operator holds UKGC authorisation to serve British customers, and what protections and support are actually available to you. A foreign licence answers only the first question; it does not establish permission to operate in the UK or UK-equivalent safeguards.
That distinction can be easy to miss when a casino’s own pages foreground its overseas licence or advertise access to British players. Treat those as separate claims, not interchangeable proof of status. Being able to open an account does not, by itself, show that the operator has the authorisation required to offer gambling services to UK residents. The legal exposure falls on the operator, while the weaker protection position falls on you as the customer. Compare the two carefully.
Protection Gap
Using a casino licensed abroad means you lack the consumer protections and independent oversight provided by a UKGC licence.
UK Eligibility and the Limits of a GamStop Exclusion
GamStop is available to UK residents. If you live outside the UK, you cannot use the service; if you are a UK resident, you can choose an exclusion period when registering. The available periods are six months, one year or five years.
The choice matters because a GamStop self-exclusion cannot be shortened or cancelled before the period you selected has ended. A change of mind does not bring the end date forward. Treat the decision as fixed for the full term, rather than as a setting you can switch off if circumstances change.
A simple timeline helps:
| Selected period | What it means |
|---|---|
| Six months | The exclusion remains in place for the selected period |
| One year | The exclusion remains in place for the selected period |
| Five years | The exclusion remains in place for the selected period |
The important comparison is not which term sounds easiest to live with today, but which one gives you the protection you intend to have over time. If you are uncertain, consider that you cannot cancel early; choosing a shorter period does not create an option to extend it mid-term, and choosing a longer one does not create an early exit.
Searches for casinos accepting UK players that are not on GamStop may reflect a wish to gamble during an exclusion. They do not change its duration or make it possible to end it early. Looking for non-GamStop casinos accepting UK players is separate from managing your GamStop status; it is not a route to cancelling the commitment you made. Keep those decisions distinct.
When the selected period has ended, the exclusion is no longer within that fixed term. Until then, plan around the end date rather than around an assumed cancellation process. The calendar is the relevant measure. No early release.
What to Check in a Non-GamStop Casino Review
A useful review of a casino not on GamStop should compare its responsible-gambling tools, not treat their mere presence as proof of protection. These sites operate outside the UKGC framework, where the tools required of UK-licensed operators do not automatically apply. A specialist review has reported that some non-UK sites offer limits, self-exclusion and reminders voluntarily; check each feature on the operator’s own site rather than assuming it is available.
| Check | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Deposit limits | Can you set a ceiling on deposits, and can you find where to set or change it? Look for an explanation of when a change takes effect. |
| Loss limits | Is there a separate control for losses, rather than a deposit cap presented as if it did the same job? |
| Session limits | Can you restrict playing time, and does the site tell you what happens when the limit is reached? |
| Reality checks | Does a reminder appear during play and show how long you have been playing or the activity covered? |
| Self-exclusion | Is there a clear way to request exclusion, and does the operator explain its scope and duration? |
The distinction between controls matters. A deposit limit restricts money paid in; a loss limit concerns losses; a session limit relates to time. A reality check is a prompt, not a limit. Read the descriptions carefully and see whether each setting is easy to locate before opening an account.
For self-exclusion, look for clear instructions, confirmation that the request has been applied, and information about which accounts or services it covers. Do not assume that an operator’s internal exclusion will connect to GamStop or other sites. It will not give you the same cross-operator coverage.
Reviews can help identify features, but they may describe a particular site at a particular time. Treat claims as points to verify, not guarantees. Check the operator’s current terms and account settings; if a feature is vague, difficult to find or described only in promotional language, do not count it as a dependable safeguard.
A review that scores casinos not on GamStop should therefore show its criteria: which tools are present, how they work, and what remains unclear. The better comparison depends on the control you need, not a headline rating. Voluntary tools are not a substitute for UKGC protections. Quite a gap.
Voluntary Tools
Some non-UK sites provide deposit, loss, and session limits voluntarily, but these are not a substitute for mandatory UKGC protections.
Offshore Casinos: A Separate Regulatory and Support Risk
An offshore non-GamStop casino sits outside the UK Gambling Commission’s oversight when it operates under a licence issued elsewhere. That distance matters: the UKGC’s rules and supervision do not automatically apply, and an operator based abroad is not required to enforce GamStop registrations. A foreign licence is not a substitute for UKGC oversight.
Some offshore operators may hold licences from jurisdictions such as Malta, Gibraltar or Curacao. The place named on a website tells you where the operator claims to be regulated; it does not, by itself, show how closely the regulator supervises the business or what practical remedy you would have if a dispute arose. Licensing from a less-established authority may offer a different level of scrutiny and recourse, not equivalent protection.
Treat a licence claim as something to verify, not a badge to accept at face value. Check the operator’s exact legal name and licence details against the relevant regulator’s official records. If those details cannot be matched, or the regulator’s role and complaint process are unclear, you have less basis for assessing who is accountable. A polished site does not fill that gap.
There is also a support difference. Players using casinos outside the UKGC framework may not have access to UK-based gambling support services through the operator, and UK consumer protections tied to a UKGC licence do not follow them abroad. If you are seeking help with gambling, an offshore operator should not be treated as a route to UK support.
The comparison is not simply “licensed” versus “unlicensed”. It is which authority oversees the operator, what protections that authority requires, and where you can turn if something goes wrong. A licence elsewhere can establish a regulatory claim; it cannot establish UKGC-equivalent safeguards. That distinction is easy to miss.
Withdrawals, Verification and Crypto Payment Risks
A payment method is only useful if you understand what happens between requesting a withdrawal and receiving it. In a non-GamStop casino review, compare the payment method, identity-check process and stated processing time separately; a quick-looking option does not remove the need to verify your account.
Complete KYC verification early rather than waiting until you request a withdrawal. A specialist review advises that early checks can help prevent delays at cash-out. Read the operator’s instructions and make sure the required verification is complete before depositing. If a withdrawal is held for checks, contact the operator through its stated support channel and keep a record of the request and response.
Timing depends on both the casino’s processing and the payment provider. A specialist review describes e-wallet withdrawals as generally faster than card withdrawals, while noting that casino processing can take up to 24 hours. That is a processing estimate, not a promise that the money will reach you within that time. Check the specific payment terms before choosing a method, and distinguish “withdrawal approved” from funds arriving in your account.
Cryptocurrency adds a separate price risk. A specialist review notes that a crypto withdrawal may be fast, but the value of the winnings can change as the cryptocurrency’s price moves. The amount received in pounds may therefore differ from its value when the withdrawal was requested.
Crypto transfers are also irreversible. Check the currency and wallet address character by character before confirming: a transfer sent to an incorrect address may be permanently lost, with no routine card-style chargeback to correct the mistake. Speed is not a substitute for a careful final check.
Are casinos that bypass GamStop illegal for UK players to use?
No, playing at a non-GamStop casino is not itself a criminal offence for a UK player. However, an operator offering gambling to UK residents without a UK Gambling Commission licence is acting illegally.
How can players get around GamStop?
Sites outside GamStop do not enforce its exclusions, but using them to get around a self-exclusion can undermine the restriction you chose. GamStop applies to UKGC-licensed online casinos; it does not automatically block every gambling service.
What are casinos not on GamStop?
They are casinos outside GamStop’s participation framework, usually because they are not licensed by the UK Gambling Commission. The label does not mean a casino is approved or offers the same protections as a UKGC-licensed site.
Is it legal to play in casinos not blocked by Game Stop?
For a UK player, playing at a casino outside GamStop is not itself a criminal offence. But an operator offering services to UK residents without a valid UKGC licence is acting illegally.
What is Gamstop?
GamStop is a self-exclusion service for UK residents who want to restrict their online gambling. UKGC-licensed online casinos are required to participate.
How does Gamstop work?
When you register, participating UKGC-licensed online casinos must restrict you from gambling with them for your selected exclusion period. The restriction applies to those participating operators, not every gambling service.
What exactly does GamStop block?
GamStop blocks registered users from gambling with online casinos licensed by the UK Gambling Commission. It does not automatically cover gambling sites outside the UKGC’s regulatory framework.
Material created by the team Jackpot City UK Guide
