A licence from another jurisdiction does not place a casino under UKGC oversight, and can mean different protections and routes for resolving issues.
What a Non-UK-Regulated Casino Actually Is
A non-UK-regulated casino is defined by one specific point: it operates without oversight from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC). The label describes its relationship with the British regulator, not its name, design, games or payment methods.
That distinction matters because “licensed” on its own does not tell you which authority oversees a casino. A site may describe itself as licensed, display a licence badge or refer to regulation in its terms. Those details do not make it UK-regulated. For that, the relevant question is whether the casino operates under UKGC oversight.
The reverse is also worth keeping clear: non-UK-regulated does not necessarily mean unlicensed everywhere. A casino may hold authorisation from a regulator in another jurisdiction while remaining outside the UKGC system. The two descriptions answer different questions. One concerns whether a licence exists; the other concerns whether the UK regulator oversees the operator.
Look past the branding
A casino’s name or presentation can create a particular impression, but neither establishes its regulatory status. A British-sounding brand, a UK-facing page or prices shown in pounds are not, by themselves, evidence of UKGC oversight. Nor does a site become UK-regulated because it offers familiar games or a polished account interface.
Payment options are not a reliable shortcut either. The way you can deposit or withdraw describes how money moves, not which regulator supervises the operator. A payment method cannot stand in for a licence, and a licence claim cannot be confirmed merely by looking at the cashier.
So when you see “licensed online casino”, read it as an incomplete description until you know who issued the licence. For a UK-regulated casino, the defining feature is UKGC oversight. If that oversight is absent, the casino falls outside the definition of a UK-regulated site, even if it presents itself as licensed elsewhere.
The useful comparison
A simple comparison keeps the terms straight:
| Description | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| UK-regulated casino | The casino operates under UK Gambling Commission oversight |
| Non-UK-regulated casino | The casino operates without UK Gambling Commission oversight |
| Casino described as licensed | A licence is claimed or held, but the word alone does not identify the regulator |
The last row is deliberately less decisive. “Licensed” is not a complete answer unless the licensing authority is identified. Two sites can both use that word while having different regulatory relationships with the UK.
This is also why lists of licensed casino sites can be misleading if they treat every licence as interchangeable. A list might include casinos licensed in other jurisdictions, but that alone does not make them UK-licensed online casinos. The relevant criterion is not how many sites appear in the list; it is whether each one is overseen by the UKGC.
The same test applies when someone asks for the best licensed casinos or new licensed online casinos. “Best” depends on the criterion being compared, while “licensed” needs a named regulator to be meaningful. For the narrower question of UK regulation, the benchmark is clear: UKGC oversight. A casino that does not have it is non-UK-regulated, regardless of how recently it launched or how it describes itself.
A precise label, not a verdict
“Non-UK-regulated casino” is a regulatory description, not a complete assessment of every feature of the site. It does not, by itself, tell you which games are offered, what the terms say or how the operator handles payments. Those are separate questions. Keeping them separate prevents a familiar brand, a particular cashier option or a general licence claim from being mistaken for UKGC supervision.
For the same reason, the phrase should not be used as a synonym for “unlicensed”. Some non-UK-regulated casinos may be licensed outside the UK; what they do not have is oversight from the UK Gambling Commission. That is the dividing line this term is meant to mark.
When comparing a UK-licensed online casino with a casino regulated elsewhere, start by naming the regulator rather than relying on shorthand. If the answer is the UKGC, the site is within the UK regulator’s oversight. If it is not, the site is non-UK-regulated for this comparison. Branding can suggest a lot. The regulator settles the label.
A non-UK-regulated casino is defined specifically by its lack of oversight from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC), regardless of whether it holds a licence from another jurisdiction.
Top online casinos in the UK
- WinBeastBonus: €5000 + 500 FS + €650 Freebet · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- AmunbetBonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ZombillionBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- DieselwinBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- NightWinBonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- SlotoSportBonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
A Casino Licence Is Not the Same as UKGC Approval
A casino licence tells you that an operator has been authorised under a particular regulatory system. It does not, by itself, establish that the operator is approved to serve customers in Great Britain. For that market, the relevant question is whether the operator holds a licence from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC).
That distinction matters because a company can have a casino licence issued elsewhere and still lack the UKGC licence required to serve customers in Great Britain. The operator’s registered address, the country named in its branding and the payment methods it offers do not replace that requirement. The licensing obligation follows the market it serves, not simply the place where the business is based.
One operator, more than one regulatory question
When you compare casino licences, separate two questions:
| What you are checking | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Which authority issued the licence? | The regulatory system under which the operator holds that licence |
| Does the operator hold a UKGC licence? | Whether it meets the licensing requirement for serving customers in Great Britain |
These are related checks, but they are not interchangeable. A licence from another jurisdiction identifies a regulator; it does not answer the UKGC question. Nor does the phrase “licensed casino” specify which authority issued the licence. Without that detail, the label is incomplete.
The same applies to phrases such as “licensed online casino” or “new licensed online casino”. “New” describes how recently a service has appeared, not whether it holds the licence required for the British market. “Licensed” needs a regulator attached to it before it can help you make a useful comparison.
Location does not change the requirement
An operator does not avoid the UKGC requirement by being based outside Great Britain. If it serves customers in Great Britain, it needs a UK Gambling Commission licence regardless of its operating base. This is the point to keep fixed when looking at claims about international reach or an overseas casino licence.
That makes a UK casino licence a specific regulatory status, not a loose synonym for having any licence. A casino may describe itself as licensed, but you still need to establish whether that means UKGC-licensed. The distinction is not cosmetic: it separates a general claim about authorisation from the particular permission relevant to serving this market.
Think of the comparison as a two-column check rather than a single badge. One column records the licence the operator says it holds; the other asks whether the UKGC is the issuing authority. If the first column contains a regulator outside the UK, that fact alone does not fill the second.
Read the wording precisely
Licensing statements can sound broader than they are. “Regulated” may refer to oversight by a non-UK authority. “Internationally licensed” may tell you that a licence exists, but not that the UKGC issued it. And an operator’s location is not evidence of its UK licensing status. Each claim needs to be read for what it actually identifies.
For the purpose of comparing an online casino licence with UKGC approval, keep the terms distinct:
- A casino licence is an authorisation associated with a named regulatory jurisdiction.
- A UKGC licence is the licence required for an operator serving customers in Great Britain.
- An overseas base does not remove that requirement.
This is a straightforward comparison, even when the marketing language is not. A licence can be genuine and still not be the licence that answers the British-market question. The regulator’s identity is the deciding criterion here—not how prominently the operator displays a badge or how confidently it describes its status.
If you are checking a casino’s claims, look for an explicit statement identifying the UK Gambling Commission as its regulator. A general reference to a casino licence, without naming the issuing authority, does not establish UKGC approval. Likewise, a foreign regulator’s name answers which jurisdiction issued that licence, but does not show that the operator holds the UKGC licence required to serve Great Britain.
This keeps the comparison focused on the operator’s obligation. It is not a ranking of regulators or a judgement about every rule attached to each licence. It is a basic distinction between holding a licence somewhere and holding the licence required for this market. Once those are treated as separate questions, the phrase “licensed casino” becomes less persuasive on its own—and more useful when the authority behind it is named.
Do
- Check if the operator holds a UKGC licence for Great Britain
- Identify the specific regulator that issued the casino licence
Don’t
- Assume a foreign licence equals UKGC approval
- Rely on the operator’s base location as proof of licensing
What UK Law Says About Using an Offshore Casino
UK gambling law draws an important distinction between the business supplying a gambling service and the person using it. The Gambling Act 2005 is directed at operators that provide gambling services into the UK market. Its focus is not on prosecuting individual players simply for placing a bet with a site based abroad.
That distinction matters if you are trying to understand the position of a British citizen using a casino licensed in another country. UK law does not expressly forbid citizens from using gambling services that hold a foreign licence. In addition, a player who gambles on a site without a UK licence does not, by that act alone, commit a criminal offence under UK law.
This is a narrow statement about the player’s criminal liability. It is not a declaration that every non-UK licence casino is authorised to serve customers in Britain, nor does it make the operator’s position lawful. The fact that a site has permission from a regulator elsewhere and the question of whether it may supply services to the UK market are separate matters.
Non-Gamban Casinos in the UK: What the Label Means
The operator’s position is not the player’s position
The law’s attention to operators helps explain why the same situation can be described differently depending on whose conduct is being considered. A company supplying gambling services into the UK market may face obligations under the Gambling Act 2005. A player who uses a foreign-licensed or unlicensed site is not treated as having committed a criminal offence simply by gambling there.
So, when you see a non-UK licensed casino, do not read its foreign licence as an answer to every UK legal question. It identifies a connection to a regulator outside the UK; it does not settle whether the operator is entitled to serve British customers. Equally, the operator’s regulatory position should not be confused with the player’s criminal liability.
That is the dividing line. Not the same question.
What this does—and does not—mean for you
For an individual, the available legal position is limited but clear on the central point: UK law does not expressly bar British citizens from using gambling services licensed in another country, and gambling on an unlicensed site is not itself a criminal offence for the player. Those points should not be stretched into a general assurance that using any foreign service is legally approved or free of consequences in every respect.
Legal Position
While gambling on an unlicensed site is not a criminal offence for the player under UK law, it does not mean the operator is authorised to serve the UK market.
The distinction also does not turn a foreign licence into UK approval. Nor does the absence of a criminal offence for the player establish that a particular operator is complying with the rules that apply to businesses supplying the British market. Player liability and operator authorisation remain separate questions.
If you are weighing up a non-UKGC-licensed casino, keep those questions apart: what the law says about the operator, and what it says about you as a player. The answer to one does not automatically answer the other.
What UKGC Licensing Changes for You
When comparing casinos available to players in Great Britain, use the UK Gambling Commission licence as the first dividing line. An operator serving customers in Great Britain needs that licence, whether its business is based in the UK or elsewhere. A foreign address does not remove the requirement.
That makes a UK Gambling Commission-licensed casino different in a meaningful way from a non-UK-regulated casino. The distinction is not the currency shown on the site, the games it advertises or the payment methods it accepts. It is whether the operator holds the UK licence required to serve this market.
A useful comparison baseline
Treat licensing as a threshold, not a ranking. It helps you separate UKGC-regulated operators from casinos operating outside that system; it does not, on its own, tell you which casino has the most suitable games, terms or payment options. Those are separate comparisons.
A UK Gambling Commission-licensed online casino is therefore a relevant starting point when you are assessing a service intended for Great Britain. If an operator serves this market without the required UKGC licence, it does not become equivalent by holding a casino gaming licence from somewhere else. The issuing jurisdiction matters.
Casino Without a UK Licence: Rules and Risks
This is also why “based in the UK” and “licensed for Great Britain” are not interchangeable descriptions. The licensing requirement follows the customers an operator serves, not simply the country in which the company is located. A non-UK-based operator can still require a UK Gambling Commission licence if it serves customers here.
What a licence list can—and cannot—tell you
A UK Gambling Commission licensed casinos list may help you identify operators in the regulated group, but the phrase “on a list” is not a substitute for understanding what you are comparing. The key question is whether the operator serving you holds the relevant UKGC licence. A brand name or a foreign casino licence alone does not answer that question.
Nor does a licence automatically make one casino the right choice for every player. It establishes the relevant regulatory category; your preferred games, offer conditions and payment arrangements may still differ from one operator to another. Better depends on the criterion you care about. Licensing is the first criterion, not the whole scorecard.
A casino operating licence is also an operator-level matter. A casino licence application is not something a player completes to gain access to a site; the operator needs the appropriate authorisation to serve the market. For you, the practical comparison is between a service operating under UKGC oversight and one that does not.
Keep that distinction clear when reading casino descriptions. “Licensed” by itself is incomplete: the useful detail is who issued the licence and whether the operator holds the UKGC authorisation required for customers in Great Britain. The address can mislead. The regulator is the comparison point.
Regulatory Comparison
- UKGC licensing is the primary dividing line for operators serving Great Britain
- A foreign address does not remove the requirement for a UKGC licence
- Licensing identifies the regulatory category, not the quality of games or terms
- The issuing jurisdiction is the only meaningful comparison point
Compare Casinos by the Terms That Affect Your Money
A welcome offer is only comparable when you know what you must do to turn it into withdrawable money. Put the key terms side by side: the wagering requirement, the amount it applies to, eligible games, expiry conditions and any cap on winnings. The headline bonus is a poor comparison on its own.
A specialist review reports offshore welcome offers with wagering requirements of 35x or more. Treat that as a figure reported for an offer, not a fixed market standard: terms differ and can change. More importantly, check what the multiple is calculated against. A requirement of 40x, also reported in a specialist review, may apply to the bonus alone, the deposit and bonus together, or a combination of bonus and free-spin value. Those bases produce different amounts of wagering, even when the displayed multiplier is identical.
For a fair comparison, write down the calculation in plain terms. If the terms say “bonus and deposit”, both amounts count as the base; if they say “bonus only”, the deposit does not. Check whether free spins are included in that same requirement or have a separate one. If the wording does not make the base clear, the offer is not yet comparable.
Free spins need their own line in your comparison. A specialist review reports requirements of 30–50 times the winnings, alongside withdrawal caps of £5–£50. These are reported terms, not a promise that every offer uses them. Check whether the cap limits the amount you can withdraw from spin winnings, and whether a separate wagering condition applies before those winnings can be withdrawn. A large win can look less valuable once a cap is applied.
Then compare restrictions that affect whether you can complete the offer at all: which games count towards wagering, whether some games are excluded, and how long you have to use the spins or meet the requirement. Read the offer terms rather than relying on a short promotional summary. A requirement that looks smaller may be less favourable if fewer games contribute.
The useful question is not which licensed casino site has the largest headline offer. It is which offer has the clearest calculation and the fewest restrictions that matter to you. Better depends on the criterion. A transparent, smaller promotion can be easier to assess than a larger one with unclear conditions.
Curaçao Licences and Crypto Payments: Two Separate Questions
A Curaçao licence and a casino’s payment options describe different things. The licence identifies a jurisdiction associated with the operator; the payment list tells you how the site may accept funds. Neither answers the other question, and a crypto payment option does not make a casino Curaçao-licensed.
Curaçao is one of several jurisdictions that may license non-UK-regulated casinos, alongside Malta, Gibraltar and Anjouan. So “Curaçao-licensed” is a claim about where an operator says it is licensed, not a description of every casino that accepts cryptocurrency. Check the licensing statement separately from the cashier’s payment list. The two can sit on the same page without being evidence of each other.
Licence first, payment method second
If you are comparing a Curaçao-licensed casino with another non-UK-regulated casino, put the jurisdiction in one column and the available deposit methods in another. That simple split prevents a common mix-up: a casino can accept crypto without holding a Curaçao licence, while a Curaçao licence does not establish that crypto is accepted.
Attention: A crypto payment option does not prove a casino is Curaçao-licensed, nor does it convert a foreign licence into UKGC oversight.
The licence label also does not, by itself, tell you which payment methods are available to you. Offshore casinos may take credit cards, e-wallets, bank transfers or cryptocurrencies, sometimes using alternative processors. The cashier is where you can see the methods the individual site presents. Availability can depend on the operator and processor; do not assume that a method listed elsewhere will appear for your account.
Crypto is relevant to a separate UK payment rule: crypto payments can bypass the UK ban on gambling funded by credit cards. That is a statement about the funding route, not an endorsement of the casino or proof that its licence is suitable for you. A crypto option does not convert a foreign licence into UK oversight.
Nor should you treat a successful deposit as proof that the same route will be available for a withdrawal. Deposit and withdrawal arrangements are distinct, and a listed method is not a promise that funds can be returned through it. Check the casino’s own payment terms before sending money, including any conditions attached to the route you intend to use.
Searches for a Curaçao-licensed crypto casino can therefore combine two separate checks: identify the stated licensing jurisdiction, then inspect the payment terms for crypto. A “no KYC” label is another claim, not a licence category or a payment method; do not infer it from either of those details. The comparison that matters depends on your priority: jurisdiction, payment choice, or both. Keep them separate.
Where an MGA Licence Fits in the Jurisdiction Picture
An MGA-licensed casino is a casino whose stated licensing jurisdiction is Malta, where the Malta Gaming Authority is the regulator. Malta is one of several jurisdictions associated with non-UK-regulated casinos; Curaçao, Gibraltar and Anjouan are also among the places operators may be licensed. The licence name identifies a jurisdiction, not a single worldwide standard shared by every regulator.
That distinction matters when you compare a Malta-licensed casino with a UKGC-licensed one. An MGA licence is not UK Gambling Commission approval, and the two labels should not be treated as interchangeable. For customers in Great Britain, the relevant question is whether the operator holds the UKGC licence required to serve that market. A Malta licence alone does not answer that question.
The operator’s location does not settle it either. A business can be based outside the UK and still need a UKGC licence if it serves customers in Great Britain. Conversely, seeing a foreign regulator named on a casino’s site does not establish that the casino is approved for the British market. Read the licence as one part of the operator’s jurisdictional identity, not as a substitute for checking which regulator applies to the service being offered.
Searches for a small or large casino licence in the UK can blur two different ideas: the size or style of a casino, and the authorisation held by an online operator. A casino app does not create a separate licensing category simply because you access the gambling service on a phone. The relevant comparison remains the operator’s licence and the market it is authorised to serve.
An MGA licence identifies the Malta Gaming Authority as the regulator; it is not a substitute for the UKGC licence required to serve customers in Great Britain.
For a practical comparison, use a short table: list the regulator named by each casino, then record whether the operator also holds a UKGC licence for Great Britain. That makes the contrast visible without assuming that a foreign licence carries the same status as a domestic one. If two casinos both display a Malta connection, that still does not make their UK regulatory position identical; check the operator and the licence claim, not just the country name or badge.
The useful distinction is jurisdiction, not prestige. Malta places a casino among foreign-licensed operators; it does not, by itself, put the casino inside the UKGC system. Which label matters more depends on what you are comparing, but the two labels mean different things.
How to Check an Offshore Licence—and What Anjouan Leaves Uncovered
A licence label tells you which jurisdiction an operator claims to answer to; it does not, by itself, show that the casino can lawfully serve customers in every country. For a useful check, identify the company named in the casino’s terms, find the licence information it publishes, and compare those details with the relevant regulator’s public records. Check that the company and licence correspond, and pay attention to the markets the licence permits or excludes.
That distinction matters when comparing a Malta-licensed online casino with an Anjouan casino. A foreign licence is not a UK Gambling Commission licence, and one jurisdiction’s authorisation should not be read as permission to operate in another. In particular, an Anjouan licence does not authorise a casino to operate in the United Kingdom or in other restricted markets. A polished licence badge cannot expand its scope.
Online Casino Malta MGA Licence: UK Rules Explained
Anjouan also illustrates why a licence comparison should look beyond the badge. Its framework does not require casinos to have random number generator (RNG) testing, undergo audits, or keep player funds segregated. Those are specific gaps in what the framework requires; they are not details you can infer from the operator’s branding or from the fact that a licence is displayed.
The funds issue has a direct consequence if an operator fails. Anjouan-licensed casinos do not guarantee that player money is kept apart from business funds, leaving players as unsecured creditors in that situation. A displayed licence therefore does not establish that your balance is protected from the operator’s financial difficulties.
Use the same checklist for any offshore-licensed casino: identify the legal company, establish which authority issued its licence, and check whether the stated authorisation covers the market in question. If the operator’s name or licence details do not line up, treat that as unresolved—not as a minor paperwork quirk. A no-deposit bonus does not answer any of these licensing questions, either; it is an offer, not evidence of regulatory permission.
The comparison is about scope and requirements, not a simple ranking of jurisdictions. A Malta licence and an Anjouan licence are not interchangeable labels, and neither should be mistaken for UKGC approval. If you are considering an offshore service, you remain responsible for checking the laws that apply to you and understanding what the licence does—and does not—cover. The badge is only the start.
The Protection You May Lose Outside UKGC Oversight
A casino’s payment options or bonus terms do not tell you what support you can rely on when gambling becomes difficult. For player protection, compare the safeguards attached to the operator’s regulatory framework: UKGC-licensed operators must provide responsible-gambling tools, while non-UK-regulated casinos may follow less stringent requirements.
Lost Protections
By using a non-UK-regulated casino, you forfeit access to mandatory UK responsible-gambling tools and the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service.
The difference is practical. At an offshore casino, you forfeit access to mandatory UK responsible-gambling tools and the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service. A site may offer its own controls, but their presence does not make them equivalent to tools required under UKGC oversight. Check what the operator actually provides and how its rules work before you deposit.
Self-exclusion has a boundary
Casinos not on GamStop do not participate in the UK Gambling Commission’s self-exclusion scheme. If you have registered with GamStop, that exclusion does not extend to these casinos. Treating it as if it did would leave a serious gap in your plan to stop gambling.
If you need to block access, do not assume that a non-GamStop casino will apply your existing UK self-exclusion. Consider whether the operator offers its own exclusion or account controls, and whether those controls fit your needs. If you are relying on a formal block to prevent gambling, an operator outside the scheme may not provide the protection you expect.
Check the safeguards, not the label
When choosing a reputable licensed online casino, the useful test is not simply whether a licence is displayed. Ask what happens if you want to restrict your play, take a break or close your account, and whether the operator’s responsible-gambling measures are mandatory under UKGC rules or depend on its own policy. Also consider that data-protection requirements may be less stringent outside UKGC oversight.
A “licensed” label alone does not establish that UK protections apply. For a UK player, the clearest comparison is whether the operator holds a UK Gambling Commission licence and is subject to the safeguards linked to it. Outside that framework, you may have fewer required tools and no access to the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service if a financial dispute arises.
No label replaces a safeguard. If you need UK self-exclusion, mandatory responsible-gambling tools or the UK financial dispute route, choose an operator operating under UKGC oversight rather than assuming an offshore site provides an equivalent.
Payments, Withdrawals and Complaints: Where Delays Become Your Problem
A non-UK-regulated casino may offer looser deposit or withdrawal rules, which can mean fewer restrictions and potentially quicker payouts. That flexibility is not a promise that a particular payment method will work for both depositing and withdrawing, or that a withdrawal will arrive promptly. Check the operator’s terms for payment-specific rules, withdrawal limits and verification requirements before putting money in.
Published withdrawal estimates conflict. Some accounts put payouts at 24 hours to five business days, while others say they can take three or four weeks. The difference matters: a payment option that appears quick on a deposit page tells you little about the time needed to receive winnings. Outside UKGC oversight, there is no regulatory clock to enforce a payout deadline. Delays, account freezes and demanding verification can therefore leave you waiting while the operator applies its own process.
Some operators may also set daily, weekly or monthly withdrawal caps, so a large win has to be paid in instalments. Specialist reviews have reported cases where withdrawal checks involved notarised documents or video calls; treat that as a possible demand, not a standard requirement across the market. Read the withdrawal terms as carefully as the bonus terms. The headline payment method is only half the deal.
Complaints require a separate check. An Anjouan casino licence does not come with an independent dispute-resolution route comparable to the one available for UKGC-approved services. The Anjouan authority does not investigate, mediate or decide individual player complaints. Its framework requires the operator to respond within 30 calendar days, but a response is not the same as an independent ruling or a remedy.
If you are comparing licensed online casinos, first establish which regulator issued the licence and whether the operator’s terms explain how payment disputes are handled. A licence label alone does not tell you the likely payout time, the verification burden or what happens if you disagree with a decision. For Anjouan-licensed casinos, the complaint route ends with the operator’s response. That is a material limit, not fine print.
What payment options are available at non-UK casinos?
You may find credit cards, e-wallets, bank transfers and cryptocurrencies, sometimes through alternative processors. Some sites also accept payments charged to your mobile phone bill or deducted from a prepaid balance.
What is the biggest risk of playing at a non-UK-regulated casino?
You may have less protection if something goes wrong: Anjouan-licensed casinos do not provide an independent dispute-resolution route comparable to UKGC-approved services, and player funds are not guaranteed to be segregated. If the operator fails, you may be an unsecured creditor.
Are non-UK-regulated casinos legal for UK players to use?
UK law does not explicitly prohibit you as a player from using gambling services licensed in another country, and players do not commit a criminal offence by gambling on unlicensed sites. However, operators serving customers in Great Britain require a UK Gambling Commission licence.
Material created by the team Jackpot City UK Guide
